Post by bossman on Aug 1, 2021 12:56:00 GMT
Over the years, we have never had a clear cut rule on which players are eligible to play in RSC finals. No coach in my time of playing the game has exploited this rule. But, I do believe we need to have some hard rules before someone tests the waters. Here is my suggestion.
RSC player eligibility rules
A player needs to be
*Under 7/7 in attack/defence rating (PL or RSC contracted).
*Any RSC listed player regardless of rating. A player can have an 8 or more in attack or defence from a stat appeal and still be listed as an rsc player for that season.
*Any player listed as a 7/7 or higher must have played 9 or more games for the RSC team before the end of the regular season. I can keep good track of this and can reveal those game counts from next round.
What do you think guys? Post your suggestions and we'll create a vote.
RSC player eligibility rules
A player needs to be
*Under 7/7 in attack/defence rating (PL or RSC contracted).
*Any RSC listed player regardless of rating. A player can have an 8 or more in attack or defence from a stat appeal and still be listed as an rsc player for that season.
*Any player listed as a 7/7 or higher must have played 9 or more games for the RSC team before the end of the regular season. I can keep good track of this and can reveal those game counts from next round.
What do you think guys? Post your suggestions and we'll create a vote.
