|
|
Post by Mackdadday on Feb 15, 2021 18:52:24 GMT
This ugly nugget is currently an angry 8/7. This was given early 2020 when he was coming back from injury. He really knuckled down thereafter.
2020.
18 games
158 metres a game at plus 10 metres plus a run.
36.88 tackles a game.
Only played 80 minutes once or twice, he makes these numbers in a lot less generally.
Requesting a very simple 8/8/1/1/7.
|
|
|
|
Post by bossman on Feb 15, 2021 20:07:34 GMT
I never thought I'd see the day that Mack actually underrates a player. That day has finally arrived.
Massive post contact metres plus 158m a game is pretty huge. In the big games I saw with Parra, the bloke gets stuck in. Im happy to go a 9 in attack.
36 tackles a games over 18 games (plus doing that at 90%) is a 9 in my book.
9/9/1/1/7
|
|
|
|
Post by crusadematt on Feb 16, 2021 0:20:02 GMT
I'll go an 9/8 good player who has hopefully put his injury problems behind him.
|
|
|
|
Post by cookmysock on Feb 16, 2021 3:01:49 GMT
8/8/1/1/6 from me....what guidelines do we use for 9 defence?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Feb 18, 2021 21:28:45 GMT
I'll go with 8/8/1/1/6. There was a spell where he played some real good footy last season but a few dips towards the end.
|
|
|
|
Post by bossman on Feb 19, 2021 1:36:23 GMT
8/8/1/1/6 from me....what guidelines do we use for 9 defence? Excellent question Bill. I cannot find the guidelines we use to use anywhere. I think we are due to come up with some new ones anyway. Guidelines are good but should not be everything when rating a player. They are good for a ballpark rating. I definitely remember 28 tackles a game being an 8. I seem to think it was 35 tackles a game for a 9 but don't absolutely quote me on it. I gave Brown the 9 def due to him being over that mark plus his low mistackle rate. |
|
|
|
Post by Mackdadday on Feb 25, 2021 5:00:06 GMT
Rerated to 9/8/1/1/6
|
|
