Post by bossman on Mar 6, 2021 9:51:25 GMT
Over the last couple of contract bidding periods, there have been some issues come up regarding on bidding on RSC contracted players. I don't want anybody to take this issue personally as no person has done anything wrong regarding the rules....just a matter of possibly doing things better than what we do.
Some people have raised the issue of some fastest finger issues that have cost some coaches some players leaving them no right of reply regarding the possible retention of players. Personally, Im not a fan of any fastest finger type bidding...I just don't think that is where the ASRL should be at....it reduces the level playing field a tad.
A suggestion has been made that if a person makes a bid for an RSC player which is $100 000 and over, the original club has a right to bid for him after bidding closes. That removes the fastest finger type stuff. I would say though that if someone bids $100 000+ for an rsc player and bidding closes before that deadline, then it should be too bad, so sad...bidding closed on that player.
What are your suggestions regarding RSC bidding?
Some people have raised the issue of some fastest finger issues that have cost some coaches some players leaving them no right of reply regarding the possible retention of players. Personally, Im not a fan of any fastest finger type bidding...I just don't think that is where the ASRL should be at....it reduces the level playing field a tad.
A suggestion has been made that if a person makes a bid for an RSC player which is $100 000 and over, the original club has a right to bid for him after bidding closes. That removes the fastest finger type stuff. I would say though that if someone bids $100 000+ for an rsc player and bidding closes before that deadline, then it should be too bad, so sad...bidding closed on that player.
What are your suggestions regarding RSC bidding?
