|
Post by tattguy35 on Apr 15, 2018 0:48:00 GMT
What site is everyone using to get stats for NRL players? I think we need to make a decision that everyone uses the same site when re rates come around because there are huge differences in some stats. 1 big example I have found.
Tackle bust:
NRL.com - has cotric leading with 33 and ponga 2nd with 30 League Live app - has ponga leading with 48 and cotric 2nd with 40.
Cotric stats are not that much different apart from 1st on 1 site and 2nd on the other, however ponga has 18 busts difference on 2 sites.
I know people have said in the past that League Live app is is close to 100% accurate but where is the proof to back this up??
Just concerned that when we do ratings after round 13, if everyone is using different sites then stats for some players on 1 site may lean coaches towards an 8 when he may be a 9 on another site and reverse.
Same rule for re rates. Alvaro has 243 tackles on league live app yet NRL.com only has him on 206 tackles
|
|
|
Post by Mackdadday on Apr 15, 2018 4:16:10 GMT
You can use foxsports and totalfootystats but FS is more comprehensive.
|
|
|
Post by tattguy35 on Apr 15, 2018 6:42:37 GMT
Thats fine as long as everyone is using the same stats
|
|
|
Post by tattguy35 on Apr 15, 2018 6:46:29 GMT
Actually its foxsports that has way different stats than league live app. sorry I thought it was NRL.com.
|
|
|
Post by bazal on Apr 18, 2018 5:32:00 GMT
I tend to use Total Footy Stats these days for basic stats, they're easy to use and seem at least reasonably accurate. But they don't have a great array of stats available. League Live used to be quite good but I must admit I've not put the app on my new phone yet If I want to look at in depth stats I go through Champion Data @ mc.championdata.com/nrl/But you do have to compile it yourself, match by match. But it's really nice in attacking stats (especially for forwards) to be able to separate stats and say "well Tim Mannah made 150m this week but 85 of that was kick returns" or whatever. I reckon for this kind of fantasy game, they are all acceptable at worst except the official NRL site, which I think is garbage. We all know there are discrepancies and the best we can do is go off what's available. I generally don't think there are differences that are great enough to change a ratings vote anyway, bar maybe one or two extreme examples.
|
|