|
Post by cookmysock on May 7, 2018 0:49:48 GMT
I think he has finally proven he is ove rthe hip injury & related form slump that has killed him off the past 2 seasons. He is back to his old, powerful, blockbusting runs, 2014 like again & its great to see. Raise that attack of his from the current 7 to a deserved 8.
& the dropsies are a thing of the past, only 3 errors for the entire season to date....that problem is also sorted.
His defence is currently a 6.......he is making 19 per game this season (averaging 39 minutes per match) & is doing enough there surely to get him to a fairly standard 7 defence when comparing to other 7 def forwards.
Currently 7/6/3/3/5
Looking for 8/7/3/3/6
|
|
|
Post by bazal on May 7, 2018 2:30:15 GMT
16 tackles, 4 missed 18 tackles, 0 missed 12 tackles, 0 missed 19 tackles, 1 missed 31 tackles, 3 missed 25 tackles, 2 missed 29 tackles, 3 missed 25 tackles, 4 missed 22 tackles, 2 missed
Are his stats in D week by week.
Sorry mate, I don't see him even getting close to a 7. His work rate is nothing special and he misses rather a few tackles. Going well with the ball again though, that's for sure.
8/6/3/3/6 for me
|
|
|
Post by Mackdadday on May 8, 2018 5:43:47 GMT
35 minutes a game. 94.5 metres a game. 2 offloads. 8 tackle busts. I just dont notice this guy when hes on the field.
7/6/3/3/6 from from me for now.
|
|
|
Post by bossman on May 10, 2018 14:34:38 GMT
My initial reaction to Burgess was an 8/6. After looking at his attack stats, I am surprised how poor they are.
While he plays well when he is on, he only plays 35 minutes....which leaves other player to pick up the slack. If he did 100m a game, I'd have given him an 8. 8 tackle busts is not that great either as a substitute for the low metres.
7/6/3/3/6 is right at this point in time.
|
|
|
Post by cookmysock on May 11, 2018 10:08:08 GMT
Shame on you Roger, diving deep into stats to make a call. (macks always been a stats-heavy rater so I forgive his erred ways)
His quick play the balls & power runs to get metres when pinned in are not on stats sheets. Can anyone find me post contact stats?
Your initial reaction is generally what indicates a player's overall ability, stats, like I say year after year, can be so deceiving in many instances.
I'll live with the 7 if thats how it turns out, but you lads will eat your words.
Baz, I give you credit for noticing what he is doing in attack.
Lets see how he goes against this alleged "mighty" dragons pack.
I'll cop the 6 defence on the chin though, I cant argue too much there.
|
|
|
Post by bossman on May 13, 2018 4:38:54 GMT
I've changed my mind...Im going 8/6/3/3/6
|
|
|
Post by bossman on May 19, 2018 23:08:00 GMT
Final ratings
8/6/3/3/6
|
|